STRAWBALE & SOLAR FOR
A SUSTAINABLE EARTH
AN IDEAL MARRIAGE
THE PROBLEM
In the 1990’s the international
community set goals for saving the world as we know it from destruction by
“greenhouse” gases and global warming. (Kyoto and other agreements.) These
goals are not being met. The destruction of the vast tropical and
subarctic
forests through timbering and drought-enhanced fires continues. Antarctica,
glaciers worldwide, and the polar ice cap are melting. Petroleum and other
non-renewable carbon-based fuels are being used up. They become ever more
expensive, hurting the poorer countries catastrophically and leading to conflict
and war in many parts of the world.
Our own desires for comfort and
convenience are reflected throughout the world. One point three billion Chinese
want to be warm in winter and cool in summer. A billion Indians desperately
need to be cool in summer as global warming makes sustained temperatures above
100 degrees f (38 degrees C) a frequent occurrence. Even in the US, sustained
high summer temperatures have killed hundreds of people annually in recent
years.
Solar technology, both active and
passive, can stop the burning of much fuel and save us from the greenhouse gases
and acid rain thereby produced. This information has been fairly well
publicized. Since manufacturers (at least in developed countries) can
potentially make money by promoting active solar, this technology will gain
ever-increasing exposure. The same is true for wind power as can be seen
especially in Europe. British Petroleum (BP) has already “seen the light” and
is actively promoting their Solar Division’s products. Unfortunately, American
oil companies are not so far-sighted. We should be conserving as much oil and
coal as possible for their useful chemical properties. What will we use for
industrial chemicals a hundred years from now if we empty the Alaskan National
Wildlife Reserve’s petroleum deposits now, instead of when we truly have an
emergency? We must also reduce our dependence on foreign oil and the potential
political instability thereby created.
What has not received so much
attention is the amazing potential of straw bale construction. Strawbale (SB)
homes, schools and other buildings can range from the primitive to the
sophisticated, but their production remains in the hands of home owners (often
the actual builders), farmers (the bale producers), and architects (the
designers of higher-end SB). Since major corporations have fewer incentives to
become involved it is up to us, the people, to spread the word and knowledge of
this world-saving approach to home building.
A SOLUTION
History – First let us look
at what strawbale construction is, and then at what could be saved. Modern SB
construction originated about 100 years ago in the Sand Hills area of Nebraska
which lacked timber, but had quality hay. The recent invention of horse or
steam powered baling machines made possible good compressed hay or straw for
wire or string tied rectangular blocks called bales (Modern bales are typically
2 or 3 string tied—polypropylene twine is best—and roughly 36” x 18” x 14”, or
46” x 23” x 16”.) Nebraska settlers desperate for housing before severe winters
set in, would use the bales like giant bricks for temporary walls, often resting
pole and sod roofs directly on the bales. When they discovered how comfortable
these homes were in the extremes of winter and summer, they were often plastered
and adapted as permanent dwellings. This “load-bearing” type, resting the roof
supports directly on the bales was the norm for decades.
Load-bearing construction is good
for one-story buildings, but in 1938 a mansion using 2,200 wheat-straw bales was
built in Huntsville, Alabama. It is now the Burritt Museum. This
“non-loadbearing” type of building used the infill bale technique in which a
frame (often barn style post and beam) and roof are built first and the bales
set in the open spaces. Two or more stories are possible with this second major
type of bale structure, but technical help with design may be needed.
There are also hybrid and other
methods for using bales in larger structures. Bales can be used to retrofit
commercial metal or pole-building kit structures, such as farm sheds, warehouses
and workshops. Other existing buildings can be wrapped with bales, the roofs
extended and doors and windows modified.
Benefits of Change – Straw
is the waste stems from harvested wheat, rice, rye, oats, barley, etc. Unlike
hay which is used for animal feed and has rodent attracting seeds, straw is a
waste product. It is hard to get rid of except by burning causing greenhouse
gases (carbon monoxide and nitrous oxide), and health-harming air pollution.
Rice straw with its high silica content may be the worst. Rotting straw
releases the greenhouse gas methane. Some straw is useful for soil
conditioning, erosion control and animal bedding. Matts Myhrman says that if
all US post-harvest straw were bales, 5 million 2,000 sq. ft. homes could be
built annually (Annual conventional housing starts are about 1 million.)
In 1991 Calif. Agr. Mag.,
vol. 45, no. 4, compared annual carbon monoxide production in that state by
straw burning and power plants as follows:
Source of CO
Tons Burned Tons CO Produced
Power
plants
25,000
Rice
straw 1,000,000
56,000
Wheat
straw 97,000 5,000
As you can see, that year straw burning
produced more than twice as much CO as did power plants. A state crackdown on
burning may be helping, but there is still the disposal problem. Ken Williams
at a SB building seminar reported that California produces enough straw per year
to build 45,000 homes.
It boggles the mind to imagine how
many SB homes could be built of rice straw in China and Japan, or wheat and rye
straw in Russia, the central Asian steppes and parts of Pakistan and north
India. Simple adobe stucco can be hand applied inside and out to finish the
kind of small homes and farm buildings that peasants and villagers might build.
Fiberglass insulation ratings for
a standard wall of 2” x 4” studs is R-11, and for 2” x 6” walls it is R-19.
Walls of standard bales have about an R-50 insulation rating. If a sandwich
roof with straw infill is used, the R rating for the dwelling can be much
higher—perhaps R-80 or R-90. Thus, heating and cooling costs are lowered
greatly. In less developed countries forest destruction for both timber and
firewood would be vastly reduced. In densely populated areas health destroying
air pollution would be greatly lessened.
Other benefits include:
- The light weight of bales, their flexibility and ease of reinforcement with bamboo,
metal, or wood pins provides excellent earthquake resistance and lifesaving potential
compared with the heavy stone, adobe, or earth blocks used in 80% of the world's
homes.
- People, including women and children,
are empowered and given pride by building something lasting that involves all
their participation.
- In overpopulated river valleys far
less scarce agricultural soil is needed for coating SB structures than for
making solid adobe or earthen blocks.
- The dense walls block noise pollution,
promoting tranquility and peace, especially beneficial in crowded communities,
multi-unit buildings and windy lands.
- Use of plaster/stucco construction
permits “painting” with incorporated dry natural pigments or whitewash, reducing
use of toxic paints and solvents.
- Fast growing bamboo, common in many
heavily populated countries can be used with SB for roofing and other structural
purposes.
- Fewer or no toxic components results
in a healthy house that “breathes”.
- Strawbale walls are bullet proof.
CONCLUSION
Each of the above-mentioned
technologies—solar, wind power, and strawbale—if widely used—has the potential
to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, if solar or wind
power were combined with SB structures, the savings could be doubled, tripled or
quadrupled.
By way of example, Spain has a
goal of producing 20% of national energy using wind power within 10 years. If
Spain were to combine this power with significant use of SB construction,
perhaps wind power could provide 30 to 50% of national energy needs.
After Hurricanes Katrina and
Rita, Americans are finally becoming aware of how interconnected the world is
where energy is concerned. We can see how energy use in China and India with a
combined population roughly eight times our own is bound to greatly increase our
energy costs, even without intervening disasters. If just these two countries
could be helped to introduce SB housing on a massive scale it would greatly
improve the future world-wide energy picture.
As pointed out earlier, there is much
less incentive for large corporations to be interested in promoting SB
technology as compared to solar and wind energy products. Therefore, if the
major energy saving potential of SB construction is to be realized, it is
important for governments overseas, nationally, statewide and locally to become
involved in promotion. In the long run, government funding for demonstration
projects, technical education and training in the US and overseas would be far
cheaper than the high cost of energy. The current disaster areas in the American Gulf Coast and in Pakistan might be good places for experimental or demonstration projects using this technology.
These costs will impact us in ways
we are only beginning to see. They will affect the economy leading either to
higher prices or less economic activity, and potential loss of tax revenues.
Government costs to assist the poor with their energy needs promises to be very
high. After this winter, we will have a clearer picture of just how high.
SOURCES
MacDonald, S.O. & Myhrman, M.:
Build it with Bales, Out on Bale, Tucson, AZ, 1995.
Steen, A.S., Steen, B. & Bainbridge, D.
(with D. Eisenberg): The Straw Bale House, Chelsea Green Publishing Co.,
White River Junction, VT, 1994.
Williams, K.: Personal communication
© Lee Aikin, Oct. 2005. Updated June 2006.